Codex Ivstianvs

Why, hello. Fancy seeing you here.

Emperor tropique du cancer toucan beak

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Another Book Recommendation

I am a member of the small-but-prevelant fraternity of dissatisfied, lost, and otherwise intemperate white guys who found solace and a sort of home in the Mexican-inflected culture of the Southwest. Not that I'm pretending to an ethnic identity (which is slippery anyway) that isn't my own. But I'm one of those guys who knows the old Spanish name for everything South of Wyoming and West of Oklahoma. And I revere the deserts and mountains of the West as a place of thinking, doing, and quiet living. So I recommend the exquisite (and hard to follow, stream-of-consciousness, crazy brilliance) "Blues for Cannibals" by white-guy-in-the-Sonoran-Desert, Charles Bowden. There's colorful characters and coral philosophy and the great praise due to a fine garden of herbs in the desert.
An Excerpt:

"I say nothing because I know what she knew. I know she has been to the dark country I have only peered into from the edges, the place where the food sits flat and empty on the tongue, whether the dead never die but neither do they ever really live, the place where sensation becomes elctroshock, where morning never begins a new day. A place worse than the room of the blue mist, a place blocked off from the river of blood, a bone garden without desire, and there is no torch song or memeory of such a time."


Read more

Monday, December 19, 2005

GREATEST. AMERICAN. EVER.

I'm watching Doris Kearns Goodwin on Charlie Rose--who just wrote a book on Abraham Lincoln, and she says that Lincoln was just "melancholy" not clinically depressed. But we can smell our own...it's like gay-dar. I call it suici-dar. Everyone's depressed, but Lincoln had hardcore clinical depression. There was a book about it, by Joshua Wolk Shenk.
Goodwin is trying to cover for Lincoln in the way that her world (of Ivy League academics striving for respect and tenure--she keeps mentioning it when one of Lincoln's cabinent went to "Harvard College" she says that more than she says "Lincoln") understands depression as a weakness. If the Greatest President Ever (and Lincoln was) could have a mental illness then he could never be respectible. But that's the point. I tell you he was PROFOUNDLY depressed. The reason that the Gettysburg Address was so short was because he thought that he wasn't up to the occassion; thus, "The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here," and, "we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground...far above our poor power to add or detract." These are the words of an eminantly worthy man who believes himself, despite his office, to be worthless. I know that he hated himself, and hated everyone around him because the only way you get to be Abraham Lincoln is by hating yourself so much that you believe that all the rest of humanity, though it be lost, is better than you and worth saving. Hemingway said that the world is "A fine place and worth dying for" because he was the sort to shoot himself in the head with a shotgun in Twin Falls, Idaho when the drinikng didn't kill him. And I know how Lincoln was because he wrote the following which is the finest thing ever in the American idiom and it's cadence and timbre is the sound--itself--of sorrow though it speaks of the most high and shining optimism:

"AT this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.
On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, urgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.
One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh." If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.
With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations."

Tolstoy was traveling in Central Russia and came across a tribe of Muslim nomads who, knowing that the Count knew of the West asked him to tell of that Cheiftan of the land so far to the west that a young man would be old when he got there and might catch the setting sun, describe that hero of the West who had freed his people who, "spoke with a voice of thunder, he laughed like the sunrise, and his deeds were as strong as the rock." They asked for Lincoln.
Leo Tolstoy showed Lincoln's potrait to that Central Asian tribesman who, "gazed for several minutes silently, like one in a reverent prayer," and the man described Lincoln's, "Secret sorrow."

That was someone.


Read more

Seriously

This cannot be said enough. There is no reason that Bush didn't get warrants from the FISA courts for the wire taps. No reason. No national security reason or anything, because the FISA allows immediate warrants. Ezra Klein says it better:


"In the interest of fairness, Bush's delivery and body language was much better at this morning's press conference than last night's speech. He also lied a lot. I keep repeating this, but only because it deserves repetition. First, read this exchange:

Q Thank you, Mr. President. Getting back to the domestic spying issue for a moment. According to FISA's own records, it's received nearly 19,000 requests for wiretaps or search warrants since 1979, rejected just five of them. It also operates in secret, so security shouldn't be a concern, and it can be applied retroactively. Given such a powerful tool of law enforcement is at your disposal, sir, why did you see fit to sidetrack that process?

THE PRESIDENT: We used the process to monitor. But also, this is a different -- a different era, a different war, Stretch. So what we're -- people are changing phone numbers and phone calls, and they're moving quick. And we've got to be able to detect and prevent. I keep saying that, but this is a -- it requires quick action.

And without revealing the operating details of our program, I just want to assure the American people that, one, I've got the authority to do this; two, it is a necessary part of my job to protect you; and, three, we're guarding your civil liberties. And we're guarding the civil liberties by monitoring the program on a regular basis, by having the folks at NSA, the legal team, as well as the inspector general, monitor the program, and we're briefing Congress. This is a part of our effort to protect the American people. The American people expect us to protect them and protect their civil liberties. I'm going to do that. That's my job, and I'm going to continue doing my job.

So Bush's only justification for his program is speed. Fine. Which is why this can't be said enough: FISA allows for immediate wiretapping without the consent of a judge. All you need to do is, three days later, go get a warrant.

Let's put this another way. Say Bush gets word of a potential hostile element. And let's assume he's got a time machine. Under FISA, he can dispatch an aide to get a warrant, then step in his machine, travel 72 hours back in time, order the wiretap, and have broken no laws. Or, let's say you don't like bending space-time. Bush gets word of a suspect, but he's busy. Harried. Frazzled. He's got a state dinner in an hour and some time allotted for the treadmill right now. He hasn't time to dispatch someone to the judge and deal with the case. He can order the tap immediately, take a run, go to dinner, procrastinate for 68 or so more hours, and then send an underling for a warrant.

I want to say this very clearly as it is absolutely the heart of the issue: there is no possible circumstance under which FISA would slow Bush's ability to respond. None. Any emergency can be handled instantaneously, with all oversight conducted retroactively. Add in that the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Courts have denied a total of three applications out of around 20,000 and you get a sense of how deliberately non-invasive this law is. FISA does nothing but ensure Bush doesn't use the NSA improperly. Nothing. Bush is attempting to muddle the issue by suggesting evasion of the FISA allows him more freedom to protect us. That's a lie. All it does is protect him. And the question the press needs to be asking is what it protects him from."


So why did the President not get the warrant, it would have been easy? What is it about these wire taps that made him think that even a secret court that almost never (5 out of more than 19,000) denies warrant applications would deny these warrants? Is it because these warrants would have been illegal even under the permissive (absurdly permissive) standards of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act? Ezra asks what this protected the President from, since clearly the standard of protecting our constitutional rights would have been satisfied by an application to the secret court. The only answer I can come up with is "the law" this protected the President from abiding by a law that might have constrained absolute executive power over all other branches of gevernment. This is more fucked up than I think people realize.


Read more

The Philosophical Underpinings of The United States

So by now you all know about the--um--secret illegal spying on American citizens that the President authorized two years ago in contravention of federal law and the 4th Amendment. So in response to that piece of horrifying news (I now end all my phone conversations with "Vigilance for Our Leader!" just in case) I want to bring up something that I find puzzling. There is this odd sense that the philosophy that guided our nation's founders was about Americans joining together to wave the flag and stand in the face of adversity while we sing songs and breathe in the fresh air of freedom. Well, that's a bunch of sappy bullshit. The Star-Spangled Banner is for pussies, and all this "My country right or wrong," crap should get you kicked out on your "patriotic" ass. Because, see the philosophy that was lodestar to the Framers was one of misanthropy, mistrust, and general leave-me-the-hell-alone-ness. People think that patriotism is all about throaty yelps of support for the country. But the Framers were so mistrustful of any power in anybody's hands that they constructed elaborate systems of checks and balances, grand juries, and warrants in order to even bring the town drunk in for fightin' on a Sunday. The whole point of the country was that they had all played by the rules and were still getting screwed with their pants on by the Crown, so they went ahead and said "Fuck this," and wrote better rules.
People seem to confuse the Revolution and the War. See, the war was the means to the revolution. The bright lights and shiny muskets and pretty colors and loud noises that everybody takes as the cue for patriotic behavior was just the goddam wrapping you dolts! The revolution is in the ideas. The idea is that it doesn't matter who the President is, he doesn't get to do shit like this because he's human, and humans are filthy liars and power grubbing little turds...every last one of them. Your gramma? Filthy liar. Your pastor? Power grubbing little turd. So the power is distrubuted parsimoniously with no single institution having enough to screw with the rest of us. And I don't mean, "Damn, environmentalists won't let us log here," screwing--that's just public policy; I mean, "I was arrested two years ago and still haven't been told the charges or allowed to see a lawyer," kinds of screwing. But when everybody gives and says it's okay because this is a "different kind of war" or whatever; and we don't make man-size sacrifices like maybe laying off the mother fucking Hummer purchases, but instead sacrifice liberties like tiny scared babies away from our mother's teat for the first time and say, "Oh, Mr. President please save us"...well that's a bunch of pussy talk and you're just lucky that George Washington doesn't crawl out of the grave and slap some man into you. American patriotism isn't waiving the flag like a drooling simp, it's reading some books and thinking that you might have an even better way to address new challenges without violating our most sacred values. And when the President spies on American citizens and he doesn't think he needs a warrant since he's the bestest little boy, his mommy told him so, well you put on your man boots and boot him and his enablers in the Congress out on their dumb asses.


Read more

Friday, December 16, 2005

High Crimes...

This is like five different kinds of illegal.

You CANNOT authorize wire-tap surveillance of American citizens without a warrant. IT IS THE LAW. The only-ONLY-exceptions are when officers or agents of the government rely in good faith on an otherwise bad warrant. But to not even seek warrants (warrants that under FISA don't even have to meat the standard of probable cause--do you know how flimsy probable cause is?) this is just beyond the pale. The President cannot knowlingly order violations of the Fourth Amendment and claim that the executive power supersedes...that's what the Bill of Rights is, a set of rules that constrains the enumerated powers of the Constitution. At any rate, part of that executive power is that "[The President] shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed." (Art II, sec. 3).

Douche.


Read more

Tuesday, December 13, 2005

I renounce my faith, again.

Having found no fulfillment in Robot Judaism, I have turned my soul toward the loving truth of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. I have been touched by His Noodly Appendage and have seen the light, and the beer volcano.


Read more

Monday, December 12, 2005

No news, no new regrets

This season, consider giving your loved ones the gift of City of Quartz by Mike Davis. It's the greatest of American stories, the story of Los Angeles. It's a story of commodification, suburbanization, anthropology, exploitation, cultural geography, and ecological disaster. It's the story of a place that has a higher concentration of science and engineering PhDs than anywhere else, and yet has absolutely no reputation for intelligence of any kind. A place without culture that has hosted many of the world's greatest minds and itself is the source of most of the consumable culture in the world. Here's a money shot from the book:

"Fused into a single montage image are Fitzgerald reduced to a drunken hack, West rushing to his own apocolypse (thinking it a dinner party), Faulkner re-writing second rate scripts, Brecht raging against the mutilation of his work, the Hollywood Ten on their way to prison, Didion on the verge of a nervous breakdown, and so on. Los Angeles (and it alter ego, Hollywood) becomes the literalized Mahagonny: city of seduction and defeat, the antipode to critical intelligence."

So give the gift of knowlege and understanding, give City of Quartz.


Read more

Saturday, December 10, 2005

The Plummer Rule

As long as I'm throwing out my theories I'd like to introduce you to The Plumber Rule via this post by Josh Marshall discussing a Washington Post story.

A week ago it was reported that Justice Department lawyers had concluded at the time that the DeLay redistricting plan of 2003 violated the Voting Right Act, but that senior DOJ officials overruled that finding and okayed DeLay's plan anyway.

Justice Department officials have now instituted a policy to assure this never happens again. They have, as reported in today's Post, "barred staff attorneys from offering recommendations in major Voting Rights Act cases, marking a significant change in the procedures meant to insulate such decisions from politics."

It's the Bush model: politics over expertise and/or law. Whether it's at the Pentagon, the CIA, Justice or the EPA hardly matters. The formula is consistent throughout.

See, this is a prime example of The Plumber Rule. What is this Rule? When your toilet is broken, you call a plumber, right? I mean, unless you are a plumber, or have plumbing experience. Likewise, when your garage door is broken you call the garage door people. Why, because you don't know what you are doing and the division of labor in a modern society means that everyone can't know everything so we have a highly splintered and specialized range of occupations whose practitioners have the specific knowlege and professionalism to do what needs to be done. The Plumber Rule says that anyone inclined against calling the plumber is equally inclined against experts in general, largely because either (1) they have control and/or inferiority issues, or (2) they disdain expert opinions in favor of some higher goal toward which they constantly strive. Christian Scientists don't listen to doctors because they believe that their faith (the higher goal) is being tested and will ultimately work out. Sometimes, if you work in the service industry especially, you will get the guy who won't listent to you because he simply believes that in all cases, he always knows better than everyone else.

The Bush Administration is a great example of the Plumber Rule. Does every reputable scientist in the world say that we are headed toward environmental and biological disaster? Yes, and the administration doesn't listen. Did the generals say that the Iraq war plan was bad? Yes, and the administration doesn't listen. Do the lawyers at DOJ say that the Texas redistricting was illegal? Yes, and the administration doesn't listen? The list goes on. We have experts and professionals for a reason. Nobody is saying that you never make decisions for yourself soemtimes the experts get it wrong (to explain why this doesn't mean that they are therefore not still good at their jobs--at least in science--I refer you to the work of Thomas Kuhn), but when you always ignore other people's advice, there's definately something wrong with you.


Read more

The Undead

I'm flipping through the television today (because it's finals season and I have to do something other than outline my classes) and I come across two things that both suck, and yet go toward proving a long held thesis of mine.
First was an episode of the mid-90s Spiderman animated series on the Family Channel (or ABC Family, or whatever). It was the episode where Spiderman tries to stop Blade from killing Morbius even though Morbius himself is a genetically mutated vampire, in the process he ignores Mary Jane Watson who gets pissed whe he misses dates as Peter Parker. It was pretty bad, but again: better than studying.
Second is the movie "Queen of the Damned" based on the Anne Rice novel of the same name, on the Sci-Fi channel. That movie sucks, it's one of the worst things ever, seriously, don't even give it a shot.
What do these two have in common? Vampires. And my theory? Vampires love, nay require, a thumping techno soundtrack. When vampires get together, there is goth/house/techno hybrid whatever music and it's bass line is kicking! (There is a lesser corollary to my theory that says vampires do everything just a little bit more goth than the average person, partly due to being undead creatures of night and darkness, partly because vampires seem to seek out insufferably affected behavior). The Spiderman cartoon wasn't really providing my thesis with support, but the Blade movies--all three (!) of them--definately lend strength to the techno-vampiric nexus I have postulated. And in "Queen of the Damned" the main character, Lestat, is not merely a vapire who likes techno, but is in fact also a wildly popular techno/goth rock star. That my friends, is what we call "ringing proof" of my thesis.


Read more

Sunday, December 04, 2005

More about immigration: Latino category

If you would like to see the subtle racism of smears against Latino(a)-Americans and their heritage in a political context, look at this old--yet comprehensive--post from crookedtimber.org (one of the best sites on the internets). See, what you do, is turn chicano membership in a chicano organization (that itself doesn't discriminate agaisnt non-chicano membership) into it's own kind of racism, because they are not activiely pro-White People. Because these people (many of whom are brown) think that Latino heritage in America is a vital and important thing that needs to be acknowledged and taken seriously as both citizens and a cultural body in all it's diversity. Those bastards! If you were to listen to MEChA, you might think that this country has a large non-Anglo heritage and many Spanish/Mexican places and place-names with a deep heritage that influences this country in a lot of positive ways. I can't believe it. Then again I don't believe it because I spent most of my life in Colorado and Arizona, where Chicanos never lived and Mexico was never an influence--that's why those places are named after towns in Scotland.


Read more